Jump to content

parrishk

Members
  • Content Count

    78
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

parrishk last won the day on July 3

parrishk had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About parrishk

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Florida, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

1241 profile views
  1. parrishk

    MFA Recovery Codes

    Seeking thoughts on the idea of providing "recovery codes" for a user to use in the event that their MFA option does not work, is lost etc. Typically, a web service will allow the saving of a set of recovery codes (typically 5-10) that can be used once to gain access to their account.
  2. parrishk

    More Authentication Options

    Perfect. It was a little bit of a roundabout way to accomplish it but it works! Just tested and was able to get it working as desired. Thank you for the feedback.
  3. parrishk

    More Authentication Options

    That is close. This setting would work if we could set a policy to require MFA and provide the user the options they can chose. As long as MFA is used that is what my concern is.
  4. parrishk

    More Authentication Options

    Bumping this request again. I had thought this would have been a more popular feature request. Just to summarize... I think it would be beneficial to enforce MFA but leave the user the option to choose which form of second factor they use (Google Auth, Yubikey, etc). Is this an option already (that I have somehow missed) or can it be considered for implementation? Thank you.
  5. Ha! Found the culprit. It looks like there were two "Connect-Src" declared in the Content-Security-Policy header...not sure if this was on your end or my end as I already had some CSP headers in place before Passwordstate began implementing them. Removed the second (CSP will only look at the first declared and ignore any additional) and all is good. Was: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self'; connect-src 'self'; font-src 'self' fonts.gstatic.com fonts.googleapis.com; form-action 'self'; connect-src api.pwnedpasswords.com Changed to: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' api.pwnedpasswords.com; font-src 'self' fonts.gstatic.com fonts.googleapis.com; form-action 'self'; connect-src api.pwnedpasswords.com
  6. parrishk

    More Authentication Options

    Has anyone else found a need for this feature?
  7. parrishk

    haveibeenpwned report

    Oh gotchya. Yeah I can see that being a benefit when the password DB gets that large...
  8. parrishk

    haveibeenpwned report

    Hi @Azkabahn You do have the option to run the report on a per-list basis. Have you tried running it against individual password lists? - Kyle
  9. Hi! That is correct. The report does indeed return passwords that are bad. Thanks,
  10. Hello, I was not sure how to describe this request in the title... Basically, looking for the feature to require two-factor authentication for all users but give the user the choice on which second factor they use. For example, a user must use AD Authentication and one of the allowed second factor options (Google Auth, Yubikey, etc). Possibly even have the option to support two second factor options. Google Auth and Yubickey (with only one being required at the time of authentication). Does this make sense? Thanks,
  11. Hello! Does the HIBP report on the screen Administration -> Reports return records for the report, is does it return no records? This DOES work. I am able to return reports globally and per password list Are you using any reverse proxies or load balancers We DO use a reverse proxy to access the server from the outside. Thank you.
  12. Ulf, what about when running HIBP reports. Does that work? It does for us...just not the button next to the password field.
  13. Hello, Thank you for your response. Answers to your questions follow: What Build of Passwordstate are you using 8679 What Browser Type are you using Firefox Chrome Brave Internet Explorer Is your Passwordstate-Gateway Windows Service started Yes What sort of certificate did you export to use with the Gateway - is it a trusted certificate, or is it a self-Signed certificate Publicly trusted certificate from GoDaddy With the URL you're using for Passwordstate, is the DNS entry for this from internal DNS, or external? If external, you may need to open access on your firewall to get to the Gateway's default port which is 7273 Internal address is resolvable. Same as primary Passwordstate URL. If you go to the screen Administration -> Remote Session Management and click on the 'Browser Based Gateway Settings' button, if there is a URL specified in the 'Gateway URL' field, please clear this, Save the change, and then test again This is cleared. From your Passwordstate web server, do you have network connectivity to the Host? You can run the following PowerShell command to determine this (change host name and port as appropriate) - test-netconnection hostname.domain.com -port 3389 Test succeeded. Also tested port 7273 with success. Do you have any firewalls enabled on your Passwordstate web server? If so, you may need to allow access on Port 7273 For the time being, firewall is not on. Thank you.
  14. Hello, Build is 8679. So far, this has occured every time since we updated to the version that supports this feature. I can run a report within Passwordstate to check against the API and that works fine. I can also query the API directly (outside of Passwordstate) without issue. Thank you.
×